Legal Opinion

United States v. Armin Ziegenhagen

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 27, 1989No. 89-1256PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

This case comes before the court on Defendant-Appellant Armin Ziegenhagen’s pro se “Motion for Change of Counsel, Setting Aside Brief, Extension of Time to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, and for Transcript. 1 Also before the court are the briefs, including a reply brief, from the parties in this direct criminal appeal. For the reasons below, we remand to the district court for an evidentiary hearing to consider whether the conflict of interest in this case denied Ziegenhagen the right to fair representation or if Ziegenhagen waived the conflict.

I. Background

On November 8,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Burger v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Melvin P. Deutsch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Samuel C. Stoia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Melvin P. DeutschCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. John Shorter, A/K/A Leon J. Johnson, A/K/A Larry Johnson, and Jerre TanksleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  5. Bigler Jobe Stouffer, II v. Dan ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API