Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Doe
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
This action is just one case of many in what can only be referred to as an onslaught of litigation commenced by pornographic movie producers, alleging direct and indirect copyright infringement based upon the accused illegal downloading of them works through BitTorrent technology. Presently before the Court is the Defendant John Doe’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (“Rule 12(b)(6)”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.
I. BACKGROUND
In order…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ino, Inc. v. Needle & Threads of West Palm Beach Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- Malibu Media, LLC v. DoeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DoeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DoeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020