Legal Opinion

H. W. Peerson Drilling Company v. Scoggins

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 30, 1954No. 6 Div. 684PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWSON', Justice.

This is a suit wherein Lloyd M. Scoggins and Euleane M. Scoggins were plain*285tiffs and Republic Steel Corporatlion; H. W. Peerson Drilling Company, a partnership composed of H. W. Peerson, Sr., H. W. Peerson, Jr., and B. E. Peerson; and H. W. Peerson, Sr., in his individual capacity, were defendants.

At the conclusion of the evidence, the trial court, upon request, gave the general affirmative charge without hypothesis, a directed verdict, for the defendant Republic Steel Corporation.

As to the remaining parties to the litigation, the case went to the jury on plaintiffs’ Count E…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Woodward Iron Co. v. EarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Tennessee Coal, Iron Railroad Co. v. AycockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Corona Coal Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Republic Steel Corporation v. StracnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  5. Woodward Iron Co. v. MumpowerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Porter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  2. Payne v. Hoover, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API