Legal Opinion

Porter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 17, 1977No. SC 2351PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal challenges the legal accuracy of a portion of the Trial Court’s oral instruction to the jury. The record on appeal was structured in accordance with appellant’s “designations” which omit the transcript of the evidence.

While this Court has reviewed the propriety of a trial court’s jury charge absent a record of the evidence (see H. W. Peerson Drilling Company v. Scoggins, 261 Ala. 284, 74 So.2d 450 (1954)1), it has declined to do so in those instances where the validity of the challenged instruction is necessarily dependent upon the evidentiary context in which it arose. Ellard v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ellard v. J. Blach & SonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  2. H. W. Peerson Drilling Company v. ScogginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trimble v. City of PrichardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Nelson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API