Legal Opinion
In Re Adams
District Court, D. Maine
Decided August 1, 1984No. Civ. 83-0373-BPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
CYR, District Judge.
The bankruptcy court denied the application to reopen a bankruptcy case for the purpose of permitting the debtor to amend the schedules to include a creditor inadvertently omitted from the original schedules. The debtor filed a timely appeal.
On October 19, 1982, the debtor filed a petition in bankruptcy. Because it appeared from the schedules that no assets would be available for distribution to creditors, creditors were notified, pursuant to former Bankruptcy Rule 203(b), 1 that it was unnecessary to file claims. The notice further informed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Birkett v. Columbia BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Milando v. PerroneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- In Re IannaconeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982
- Matter of ZablockiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
- La Bate & Conti, Inc. v. Davidson (In Re Davidson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re BeshenskyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1987
- In Re MaddoxUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- In Re GalvinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 1985
- In Re PalijUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- In re VelazquezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1987