Legal Opinion
Haden v. DAVID J. SACKS, PC
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided September 11, 2009No. 01-03-00025-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REMAND
SHERRY RADACK, Chief Justice.
Appellants, Charles M. Haden, Jr., individually (Haden), and Charles McIntyre Haden & Company d/b/a Haden & Company (the company), challenge an award of $90,000 for attorney’s fees and costs to appellee, David J. Sacks, P.C. d/b/a Sacks & Associates (the law firm), incident to turnover relief obtained by the law firm pursuant to section 31.002(e) of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 31.002(e) (Vernon 2008) (the turnover statute). The law firm sought relief under the turnover statute to enforce the final…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- City of San Antonio v. City of BoerneTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. BullerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Remote Control Hobbies L.L.C. A/K/A and D/B/A Remote Control Hobbies v. Airborne Freight Corporation D/B/A Airborne Express Successor by Merger to DHL Express, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- in Re Old American County Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2014