Legal Opinion

La Croix v. May

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 15, 1883PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.

The facts alleged in the complainant’s bill entitle .him to an injunction restraining defendants from the use of his trade*237mark, irrespective of tlie lights which he acquired by the registration of his trade-mark under the act of congress of March 3, 1881. Taylor v. Carpenter, 3 Story, 458; 2 Wood. & M. 1; Taylor v. Carpenter, 11 Paige, 296. The fact that complainant is an alien does not affect his right of property in a trade-mark; but that fact, as it establishes the requisite diversity of citizenship between the parties to confer jurisdiction upon this court, is indispensable to the cause…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. SteffensSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Taylor v. CarpenterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1844

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thomas G. Carroll & Son Co. v. McIlvaine & Baldwin, Inc.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1909
  2. Norwich Pharmacal Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  3. Emmons v. National Mut. Bldg. & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1905
  4. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. AllenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1910
  5. Lewis v. TrinkleinMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API