Legal Opinion

United States Rubber Products, Inc. v. South Carolina Tax Commission

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 13, 1939No. 14807PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

The respondent is a foreign corporation which operates a plant at Winnsboro, Fairfield County, South Carolina, where it manufactures a certain fabric which is sent out of the State and is there processed; that is to say, it is used in the making of automobile tires and other articles. None of the fabric is sold in the State in which it is manufactured at the Winnsboro plant.

The defendant-appellant is an administrative arm of the government of South Carolina, charged with the duty of assessing and collecting income taxes.

For the years…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Lead Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. City of Spartanburg v. LeonardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  4. Read Phosphate Co. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Etiwan Fertilizer Co. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  2. Oklahoma Real Estate Commission v. National Business and Property Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  3. Oklahoma Real Estate Commission v. National Business And Property Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API