Legal Opinion

Gillen-Cole Co. v. Fox & Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEossman, J.

July 18, 1930, the plaintiff instituted this action, alleging that it had sold merchandise of the value of $1,445 to the defendant, Fox & Company, which it averred to be a corporation. July 7, 1931, it recovered judgment. In the latter part of 1928 or some part of 1929, all of the assets of Fox & Company were conveyed to the Plumbing & Heating Sales Corporation which did not require Fox & Company to furnish a list of its creditors and did not notify Fox & Company’s creditors of the intended purchase. The plaintiff, believing that our bulk sales law (sections 64-101 to 64-104, Oregon Code…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Van Landingham v. United Tuna PackersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Oregon Mill & Grain Co. v. HydeOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Houston v. Utah Lake Land, Water & Power Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Klorfine v. ColeOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Hartwig v. RushingOregon Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. High v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Joseph A. Holpuch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  3. High v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API