Legal Opinion
Walsh v. Royal Insurance
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 18, 1988No. Civ. A. No. 88-5618PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LUDWIG, District Judge.
This is a declaratory judgment action involving uninsured motorist benefits. Jurisdiction is diversity. 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
On July 22, 1986, while operating his uninsured motorcycle, plaintiff James Walsh was injured in a collision with an automobile that also was uninsured. At the time of the accident his parents, plaintiffs Thomas Patrick Walsh and Ann C. Walsh, maintained insurance on their automobiles with defendant Royal Insurance Company. Plaintiffs claim that James Walsh, as a “resident relative” insured, living in his parents’ household, is entitled to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. BigelowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Adelman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Bankes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.