Legal Opinion

John Williams v. Robert B. Carney

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 26, 2008No. 07-11772UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

John Williams, an attorney proceeding pro se, appeals the imposition of sanctions against him, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, based on the filing of a frivolous 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, which alleged claims against: (1) Billing, Cochran, Heath, Lyles, Mauro & Anderson, P.A., a law firm; (2) Michael Weiss and Hal Anderson, attorneys with the law firm (collectively referred to as “the Firm”); and (3) Judge Robert Carney, a Florida state court judge. 1 The district court dismissed Williams’ complaint, which we affirmed, and the Firm sought Rule 11 sanctions against Williams…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Sandra Jackson v. BellSouth TelecommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  4. William Riccard v. Prudential Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  5. ACLU of Georgia v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. EVERAGE v. BUNNINGDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API