Hoffmann v. Krause
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
A directed verdict in favor of defendants was a correct ruling in this case. As a matter of law, no proximate causal connection is shown between the negligence, if any, of the defendants in parking their cars as they .did, and the damage to the plaintiff’s automobile. The evidence most favorable to plaintiff reveals that the intervening acts of (plaintiff in failing to control his car were the sole cáuse of the accident. His testimony is that he saw the two parked vehicles when approximately three hundred feet away. He then applied his brakes and skidded off the highway. But he, at no time,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Albrecht v. Waterloo Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Suter's Administrator v. Kentucky Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Mounts v. TzugaresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Simon v. Dixie Greyhound Lines, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ryan v. CameronWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Reuhl v. UszlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
- Martin v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Phillips v. HaringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Retzlaff v. Soman Home FurnishingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.