State v. Murray
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTS, Justice.
Harold Murray appeals from his conviction of gross sexual misconduct, 17-A M.R. S.A. § 253 (Supp.1988), after a jury trial in Superior Court, (Cumberland County, Li-pez, /.). Murray asserts that the five year old victim was not competent to testify and that the court should not have permitted the prosecutor’s continued attempts to elicit incriminating testimony from her. He also challenges the court’s refusal to grant a new trial. Because we find no reversible error at trial or in the denial of a new trial, we affirm the judgment.
Harold Murray was accused by a five year old…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HusseySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- State v. McFarlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- State v. WoodburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- State v. GroverSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- State v. FischerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CalorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- State v. RomanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- State of Maine v. Gabriel J. HansenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
- State v. SpoonerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Brown v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.