Legal Opinion
Wible v. Abraham
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 31, 1929No. 3 Div. 882PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The negotiable character of the instrument, the subject-matter of this litigation, was not destroyed or affected by the recital therein “for rent McLemore place on Vaughn Road, one hundred and sixty acres, for year 1925,” which constitutes only a statement of the transaction which gave rise to the instrument. Section 9031, Code of 1923; People’s Bank v. Moore, 201 Ala. 411, 78 So. 789; Culbreath v. Guiterman, Rosenfield, etc., 217 Ala. 259, 115 So. 303; Strand Amusement Co. v. Fox, 205 Ala. 183, 87 So. 332, 14 A. D. R. 1121; Bank of Chattanooga V. Clayton, 206 Ala. 518, 90 So. 899; Verner v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strand Amusement Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- People's Bank v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Verner v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Culbreath v. Guiterman, Rosenfield & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Reliance Equipment Co. v. ShermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Snell Nat. Bank v. JanneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Walsh v. Bank of MoundvilleAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935