Legal Opinion

Verner v. White

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 25, 1926No. 6 Div. 638PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The promissory note sued upon was given for services to be rendered under an executory contract. At the time of execution the maker wrote upon the face of the paper, and across the marginal end thereof, “subject to terms of contract.”

The single question presented is whether this entry on the note destroyed its negotiability and let in the defense of failure of consideration as against an indorser for value before maturity. Pertinent matter so written at the time of execution becomes a part of the contract as if found in the body of the instrument. Seymour v. Farquhar, 93 Ala. 292, 8 So. 466;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strand Amusement Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Chicago Trust & Savings Bank v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Klots Throwing Co. v. Manufacturers' Commercial Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  4. Slaughter v. Bank of BisbeeArizona Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Seymour & Co. v. FarquharSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Culbreath v. Guiterman, Rosenfield & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. The People v. GouldIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Reliance Equipment Co. v. ShermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Fayetteville Building & Loan Ass'n v. CrouchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. First Bank of Marianna v. Havana Canning Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API