Legal Opinion

Miller v. Roach

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 26, 1889PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, J.

This is an action of contract brought by the payee of a promissory note in the usual form, containing the words “ we promise to pay,” with nothing in the body of the note to indicate who are meant by the word “ we.” On that part of the note where the signature is usually found, there is stamped a large circular corporate seal, upon the face of which, in a circle near its outer edge, appear in print the words, “ New York Skating Rink Construction Company,” and in the centre of it the words, “ Incorporated 1884.” A little to the left, and below the centre of the seal, in such position that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. FarnsworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Mann v. ChandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
  3. Chipman v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Queens County Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. New Georgia National Bank of Albany, Georgia v. J. & G. LippmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Reeve v. First National BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
  4. Jacobs v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  5. Consumers Twine & Machinery Co. v. Mount Pleasant Thermo Tank Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API