Legal Opinion

Continental Tennessee Lines, Inc. v. Fowler

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Prewitt

In the outset it will be observed appellees have filed a motion to transfer this cause to the Court of Appeals.

Section 30, Chapter 162, Public Acts of 1953 provide as follows:

“Appeals. Be it further enacted, That an aggrieved party may secure a review of any final judgment of the Chancery Court under this Act, upon giving bond as required by law in other chancery cases, by direct appeal to the Supreme Court, notwithstanding the provisions of any other statute to the contrary. In the Supreme Court the cause - shall be heard upon the transcript of the record before the Chancery Court; and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoover Motor Exp. Co. v. Railroad & Public Utilities CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  2. New York Electric Lines Co. v. Empire City Subway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Woodroof v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Tenn. Cartage Co., Inc. v. PharrTennessee Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Associated Transport, Inc. v. FowlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Blue Ridge Transportation Co. v. HammerTennessee Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API