Legal Opinion

State v. Crocker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2007No. 05C46614; A129507Published

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant, who was convicted after a jury trial of first-degree sodomy, ORS 163.405, appeals, challenging the imposition of an upward departure sentence. He argues that the aggravating factors on which the trial court predicated the upward departure sentence — “prior criminal justice sanctions have not deterred defendant” and “defendant has a history of institutional or prison disciplinary problems” — are unconstitutionally vague. We reject those arguments and, consequently, affirm.

The circumstances material to our review are undisputed. Defendant was convicted by a jury of first-degree…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. State v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. State v. SchenewerkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API