Farwell v. Huling
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. O. H. Horton, Judge, presiding.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. O. H. Horton, Judge, presiding. On the 18th of October, 1884, Edward C. Huling, appellee, Henry S. Farwell and Stephen Laskey formed a co-partnership, in the city of Chicago, for the purpose of carrying on the business of “manufacturing and jobbing men’s furnishing goods,” with a capital of $60,000, $40,000 of which was to be furnished by Farwell, and $20,000 by Huling,—Farwell and Huling each to have forty-five per cent, and Laskey ten per cent of the…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkin
An attempt, at least, was made in the proceeding below to follow the recognized chancery practice in such eases. The cause was referred to the master to state an account. Parties appeared before him and made objections to his findings, and on the coming in of his report they filed exceptions thereto corresponding with the objections previously made before the master. It is certainly true that some of the objections are so general as to amount to nothing by way of exceptions to the report. We agree with the Appellate Court in holding that neither the chancellor nor a court of review could, by…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Macfadden v. JenkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
- McIlvaine v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
- Greer v. AndrewSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Rossing v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Acme Copying Co. v. McLureAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.