Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Rhino Shield

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 2018No. 17AP-751PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSadler, J.

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Ruth A. Hunter and David G. Hunter, appeal from the July 18, 2016 judgment entry of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting the motion to dismiss filed by defendant-appellee AmCoat Industries, Inc., for lack of personal jurisdiction, denying appellants' motion for sanctions, and denying appellants' motions for default judgment and renewed supplemental motion for default judgment and sanctions as moot, and appeal from the April 25, 2017 judgment entry denying appellants' motion for reconsideration. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. Quarterman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Pitts v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Goldstein v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. E.T.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Hunter v. Rhino ShieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Robol v. ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  4. Hunter v. Rhino ShieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Watson v. Rankin-Thoman, Kinman-Kindell, Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API