Legal Opinion
Robol v. Columbus
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 20, 2025No. 24AP-348PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Robol v. Columbus,
2025-Ohio-973.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Charles Robol, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 24AP-348 (C.P.C. No. 22CV-7497) v. : (REGULAR CALENDAR) City of Columbus et al., : Defendants-Appellees. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on March 20, 2025 On brief: Charles Robol, pro se. Argued: Charles Robol. On brief: Zach Klein, City Attorney, and Sarah Feldkamp, for appellees. Argued: Dexter W. Dorsey. APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas PER CURIAM. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Charles Robol, pro se, appeals from a decision and entry…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- BBI Logistics, L.L.C. v. GRS Transport, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026
- Capital One, N.A. v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
- Sultaana v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025
- Johnson v. DziakOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
- O'Brien v. BarronOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.