Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rauch v. Urgent Care Pharmacy, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 18, 2006No. COA05-472PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Judge.

On 9 January 2003, Virginia Rauch ("plaintiff") filed a complaint alleging that she developed serious health problems, including fungal meningitis, as a result of receiving injections of contaminated methylprednisolone. The contaminated methylprednisolone had been compounded by Urgent Care Pharmacy, Inc. ("Urgent Care"), and sold to FirstHealth of the Carolinas, Inc. ("FirstHealth") for use in FirstHealth's hospital and pain clinic. As alleged by plaintiff, Urgent Care's compounded methylprednisolone injections had been contaminated with a fungus which caused individuals…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Viar v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Green Ex Rel. Downs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Teachy v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harbour Point Homeowners'assoc., Inc. Ex Rel. Bd. of Dir. v. Djf EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Saft America, Inc. v. Plainview Batteries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Padron v. Bentley Marine Grp., LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. State v. W. Sky Fin., LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2015
  5. Saft America, Inc. v. Plainview Batteries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API