Legal Opinion

John McGill v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 20, 1959No. 14792_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BASTIAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant appeals his conviction for the crimes of robbery (three counts) and assault with a dangerous weapon. We allowed an appeal in forma pauperis, and appointed counsel to represent him in this court.

Counsel first urges that the trial court hampered the impeachment of the complaining witnesses by refusing to permit appellant’s trial counsel 1 to ask them if they had earlier made inconsistent statements. What happened was that certain questions of a preliminary nature were asked and the judge required counsel to call to the witnesses’ attention the specific prior…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Edward Wanzer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  4. Frank A. Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  5. William Josehp Matthews v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Anthony F. WrightCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. Williamson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. Larry Drake Atkinson, United States of America v. Amos Manuel DuboisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Charles Maynard, United States of America v. Kermit N. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Donald Mark NathanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API