Legal Opinion

United States v. ReBrook

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided January 19, 1994No. Crim. 2:9300151-001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

Pending is Defendant’s motion for a new trial, filed in accordance with Rule 33, Fed. R.Crim.P. 1 The government has filed a response opposing the motion. On November 5, 1993, after a four-day trial, a jury convicted Defendant of both counts of a two-count indictment charging him with wire fraud and insider trading. The Court will sentence Defendant at 11:30 a.m. on Monday, February 7, 1994.

I

Defendant argues he is entitled to a new trial 2 because the Court erred in denying his motions to dismiss the indictment filed prior to trial, and his oral…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Debra Horta v. Charles B. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. Robinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Weiss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  5. United States v. James O. BakkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,794 United States of America v. William Edward Rebrook, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API