Legal Opinion

Aneshaensel v. Twyman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1908No. 6,817PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Marion Circuit Court (14,962); Henry Clay Allen, Judge. Suit by Otto Aneshaensel against Katy, alias Daisy, Twyman and others. From a decree for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRabb, C. J.

Maggie Cunningham Twyman was, during her life, the owner of the premises that are in controversy in this ease, together with other real estate in the city of Indianapolis. She died testate in August, 1904, leaving as her survivors her children, Katy Twyman, James E. Twyman, Harry Cunningham, and the appellant’s wife, Annie, the appellees in this case. Her will contained, among other provisions; the following:

“Item 6. I give, bequeath and devise to my daughter, Annie Aneshaensel, my property known as No. 434 and No. 438 East Wabash street, described as follows: Fifty feet off the south end of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fowler v. DuhmeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Taylor v. StephensIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Aspy v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Ross v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Moores v. HareIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holien v. TrydahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Smith v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Clark v. ThiemeIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Franklin College v. WolfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Smith v. PyleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API