Legal Opinion

Holtzman v. Richardson

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 13, 1973No. 73-C-537PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDD, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff, a member of the United States House of Representatives from a Brooklyn district, seeks a determination that the President of the United States and the military personnel under his direction and control may not engage in intensive combat operations in Cambodia and elsewhere in Indochina in the absence of congressional authorization.

Motions

1. Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment declaring that the defendants may not order American military forces to combat in Cambodia and granting appropriate injunctive relief.

2. Plaintiff has also moved…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McLellan v. Mississippi Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Soler v. G & U, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  3. Thomas Moore, and Vermont Welfare Rights Association, Intervenor-Appellant v. Joseph Betit, Commissioner of the Vermont Department of Social WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  4. Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities v. NixonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
  5. AJ Taft Coal Co., Inc. v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API