Legal Opinion

AJ Taft Coal Co., Inc. v. Barnhart

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided November 14, 2003No. CV 03-P-1390-SPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PROCTOR, District Judge.

This case represents one chapter in a long-running dispute between coal operators, the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”), and the Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Combined Benefit Fund (the “Trustees” and the “Combined Fund,” respectively). The dispute centers on the meaning of “reimbursements” in the calculation of the premium formula under § 9704(b)(2) of The Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act of 1992, 26 U.S.C. §§ 9701-9722; 30 U.S.C. § 1232(h) (“Coal Act”). The dispositive issue in this case,…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  4. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. A. T. Massey Coal Co v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  2. Sidney Coal Company, Inc. v. Social Security Administration, (04-6286), Michael H. Holland, Intervenors (04-6291)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. Holland v. A.T. Massey CoalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  4. Continental Motors, Inc. v. Jewell Aircraft, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2012
  5. Navajo Health Foundation-Sage Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. BurwellDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API