S & R Auto & Truck Service, Inc. v. City of Charlotte
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.
It is to be noted that the plaintiff is permitted by the city to carry on and does carry on, within the city, the business of towing disabled or other automobiles when requested to do so by the owners of the vehicles. We, therefore, do not have before us and we express no opinion as to the authority of a city to regulate or restrict the right to engage in such business or the charges to be made for such service. The “licensing” provisions of the ordinances now before us relate solely to towing service supplied upon the call of a police officer when the owner (or his representative) does not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Suddreth v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Hempstead T-W Corp. v. Town of HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- City of Chattanooga v. FanburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
- City of Dallas v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Mills v. Tri-State Motor Transit CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- City of Indianapolis v. Clint's Wrecker Service, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Hutchins v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Lutz v. Gaston County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Kaletsky v. Uptown Garage, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.