Legal Opinion
United States v. Daugerdas
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 23, 2010No. S3 09 Cr. 581 (WHP)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge:
Defendant Denis Field (“Field”) moves to preclude the Government from relying on communications between BDO Seidman LLP (“BDO”) and its outside attorneys, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP (“Morgan Lewis”) and Hogan & Hartson LLP (“Hogan & Hartson”). Specifically, Field contends that BDO improperly waived attorney-client privilege as to those communications by failing to obtain his consent. For the following reasons, Field’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
I. The Investigation & Indictment
The Third Superseding Indictment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated September 15, 1983 Marc Rich & Co. A.G., Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- In Re Richard Roe, Inc., and John Doe, Inc. United States of America v. Richard Roe, Inc., Richard Roe, John Doe, Inc., and John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings Gary Katz, Witness. Benjamin Jamil, Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chevron Corp. v. SalazarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Xia v. 65 West 87th Street Housing Development Fund CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021