Legal Opinion

Hill v. Superintendent, Missouri Division of Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 1984No. 46427PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Judge.

This is a garnishment action.

Plaintiffs, Terresa and Rick Hill (Hills), are judgment creditors of Kenilworth Insurance Company (Kenilworth), an insolvent company domiciled in Illinois. Defendants are the Director of the Missouri Division of Insurance (Director/Missouri), a garnishee of Kenilworth, and the Director of the Illinois Division of Insurance (Director/Illinois), the Illinois receiver in liquidation for Kenilworth. Defendants appeal from the trial court’s judgment ordering the Director/Missouri to satisfy a judgment the Hills had obtained against an insured of Kenilworth…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. KnottSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. G. C. Murphy Co. v. Reserve InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Gray Ex Rel. Brokel v. ClementSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  4. Pogue v. SwinkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  5. State Ex Rel. Ingram v. Reserve InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Huntington-Cleveland Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Garcia v. Island Program Designer, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API