Legal Opinion

Gosney v. Costigan

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 31, 1930PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, P. J.

This is an equitable action by one trustee to require his co-trustee to restore to the trust estate certain bonds alleged to have been improperly appropriated from such estate, or for judgment in favor of the estate in lieu thereof. A third trustee was made a party defendant. Trustees of two closely related organizations were afterward brought in as defendants. The trial court found for defendants and denied all prayers for removal of trustees. From such decree plaintiff has appealed.

The pleadings should first be noticed briefly. The following facts appear from the allegations of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foley v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. Jones v. FallsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Tygard v. McCombMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Meyer v. KoehringSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pangarova v. NicholsWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  2. In re the Estate of PastoreNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  3. Roethemeier v. VeithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. In Re Estate of HoffmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  5. Scott's Exr. v. BelandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API