Board of Education v. Dudra

In Cincinnati v. Bossert Machine Co., 16 Ohio St. 2d 76, we clearly announced the mandate under the provisions of Section 163.08, Revised Code, that no extension of time for filing an answer shall be granted to a defendant whose property is the subject of a petition for appropriation by a public agency. In comment regarding Sections 5519.02 and 163.08, Schneider, J., at page 78, reasoned: “In either case, the purpose of the respon*119sive pleading is to raise the issue of proper valuation.” In the Bossert Machine Co. case, the petition stated an alleged value of the property to be appropriated.

Hav…