Legal Opinion
Jones v. Dirty World Entertainment Recordings, LLC
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided August 12, 2013No. Civil Action No. 09-219-WOBPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAM O. BERTELSMAN, District Judge.
Background
At the conclusion of the presentation of evidence in the second trial of this case, the defendants made a timely motion for judgment as a matter of law under Fed. R.Civ.P. 50.
The motion was primarily based on the argument that the defendants were immune under the Communications Decency Act (“CDA”), 47 U.S.C. § 230. The Court denied the motion for the same reasons expressed in its earlier opinion addressing this issue. See Jones v. Dirty World Entm’t Recordings, LLC, 840 F.Supp.2d 1008 (E.D.Ky.2012).
The jury hung in the first…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Kenneth M. Zeran v. America Online, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Fair Housing Coun., San Fernando v. Roommates. ComCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Johnson v. ArdenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Chicago Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Inc. v. Craigslist, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jones v. Dirty World Entertainment Recordings LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- J.S. v. Vill. Voice Media Holdings, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- J.S. v. Vill. Voice Media Holdings, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- J.S. v. Village Voice Media Holdings, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Sarah Jones v. Dirty World EntertainmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014