Legal Opinion
State v. Almly
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 31, 2007No. 1 CA-CR 06-0471PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OROZCO, Judge.
¶ 1 The State of Arizona appeals the trial court’s order dismissing the charge of Fraudulent Schemes and Artifices against Eric Almly (Defendant) with prejudice for failure to comply with the speedy trial provisions of Article III of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD). For the following reasons, we affirm.
INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERS
¶2 The IAD, Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 31-481 (2002), is an interstate compact adopted by this state, the federal government and forty-seven other states to provide uniform standards for transferring prisoners…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Leroy SorrellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Steven J. Casper, M-8294 v. Joseph Ryan, and the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, and the District Attorney for Philadelphia CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Ullery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nevens Ex Rel. Hardt v. AZHH, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Carlos Lamont Fisher, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
- Carlos Lamont Fisher, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
- Fisher v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
- Fisher v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.