E. Ingraham Co. v. Germanow
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HANEÍ, Circuit Judge.
The suit is in equity to enjoin the defendants from the infringement of a patent. On consent of both sides the District Court entered a decree on'June 29, 1922, declaring that claims 3 and 4 of the patent in suit were valid, that the plaintiff owned the patent, that the defendants had infringed the claims, and that they should be enjoined. Profits, damages, and costs were waived. Later, and on February 4, 1924, in another suit against other parties, but upon the same patent, this court held that claims 3 and 4 were invalid, and dismissed the bill. The defendants, after…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Central Life Securities Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916
- Pooler v. HyneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914
3Cited by18 opinions
- Vuitton Et Fils S. A. v. Carousel Handbags, and Solomon Mizrahi, Joseph Mizrahi, and Maurice Mizrahi, Additional DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Nat Yanish v. Bruce G. Barber, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Tscherim Soobzokov v. Cbs, Inc., Quadrangle/new York Times Book Co., Inc., and Howard Blum, Anthony J. DevitoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Warner v. Tennessee Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Butler v. ButlerUtah Supreme Court · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.