Holland v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtRhonda K. Wood, Associate Justice
|! Robert Holland was convicted of capital murder after a jury found that he had strangled his prison cellmate to death. He received the death penalty. On appeal, Holland raises three-issues. Only one of these issues is properly preserved: wheth-, er the circuit court should have sustained Holland’s Batson challenge to the State’s use of peremptory strikes to exclude three African Americans from the jury. We hold that the court’s decision to reject Holland’s Batson challenge was not clearly against the preponderance of the evidence and affirm Holland’s sentence of death.
As of December 2012,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wicks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bobby Kellensworth v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2021
- Clarence Turnbo v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2021
- Robert Holland v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2022
- Valley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
- Justin Thornton v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2026