Legal Opinion

Frenzel v. First National Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The sole question on this appeal is whether there is any credible evidence in the record to sustain the finding of the jury in the special verdict that the damage to plaintiffs’ barn was caused by windstorm. In passing on *644this question the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to sustain the verdict. Smith v. Benjamin (1952), 261 Wis. 548, 53 N. W. (2d) 619; and Smith v. Koch (1945), 247 Wis. 551, 20 N. W. (2d) 566.

The alleged damage was the pushing outward to the south and the crumbling of the south stone foundation wall of the barn. The dimensions of the barn were 90 feet…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hyer v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Weber v. MayerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Walraven v. Sprague, Warner & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Smith v. BenjaminWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Smith v. KochWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tri-Motors Sales, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Guinther v. SchuchtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Bush v. MahlkuchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Kudella v. Newark InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API