United States v. John Wayne Bingham, AKA Robert Bingham
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Bingham appeals his conviction for unarmed bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), contending that there was insufficient evidence from which the jury could find “intimidation.” We affirm the judgment of conviction.
Taking by intimidation is the willful taking in such a way as would place an ordinary person in fear of bodily harm. United States v. Alsop, 479 F.2d 65, 66 (9th Cir. 1973). Here, the bank teller’s subjective fears were reasonable. It is undisputed that Bingham told the teller that she had “three seconds” to give him the money in the top drawer, and then repeated this demand while…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. Richard Daniel AlsopCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Tommy Ray HigdonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. David Henson, A/K/A Paul v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Terrill Douglas HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Gordon Howard Lucas, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. William FerreiraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.