Legal Opinion
Juneau Spruce Corp. v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided March 11, 1949No. 5996-APublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLTA, District Judge.
This action is brought under Section 303 of the Act of June 23, 1947, 61 Stat. 158, 29 U.S.C.A. § 187, commonly known as the Taft-Hartley Act, to recover damages in the sum of $193,000. The complaint alleges that the defendants, by means of unlawful picketing and coercion, have caused plaintiff’s employees to refuse to perform any services since April 10, 1948, for the purpose of accomplishing objects prohibited by that section, in consequence of which plaintiff has been compelled ever since to suspend its mill operations.
The defendants have demurred to the complaint on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. International Union, United Mine Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1948
- Page v. BurnstineSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- The MaretCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Federal Trade Commission v. KlesnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gonzalez Padin Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Juneau Spruce CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Boeing Airplane Co. v. Aeronautical Industrial Dist. Lodge No. 751District Court, W.D. Washington · 1950
- Juneau Spruce Corp. v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1955
- United States v. KingDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1954
- United States v. TalbotDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.