Legal Opinion

Bickerstaff v. Cuyahoga County

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided October 21, 2019No. 1:18-cv-01142Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Brenda Bickerstaff, Case No. 1:18cv1142 Plaintiff, -vs- JUDGE PAMELA A. BARKER Cuyahoga County, et al., MEMORANDUM OPINION AND Defendants ORDER Currently pending are the Objections of pro se Plaintiff Brenda Bickerstaff and Defendants Daniel McCandless, DeLonzo Goshen, Donald Nuti, and Timothy McKenzie to the Report & Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Parker dated August 12, 2019. (Doc. Nos. 90, 91, 92.) For the following reasons: (1) Plaintiff’s Objections (Doc. Nos. 90, 91) are DENIED; (2) the Objection of Defendants…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API