Legal Opinion

In re J. Scott Brown

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 2013No. 13-BG-51PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that we disbar James Scott Brown because Mr. Brown was convicted of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud, which constitutes a crime of moral turpitude per se. We agree and accept the Board’s recommendation.

I

Respondent James Scott Brown was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Bar Counsel filed with this court a certified copy of Mr. Brown’s judgment of conviction, and we suspended Mr. Brown under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of ColsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Matter of BondDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. In Re EvansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. In Re LicksteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Wayne R. RohdeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. In re David H. MillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. In re Joseph J. O'HaraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. In re Wayne R. RohdeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API