Lawlor v. Linforth
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
This was an action for treble rent for one month of certain premises, and for restitution thereof.
The plaintiff had judgment against one of the defendants as prayed for and for costs, but against the other defendant for restitution of the premises only.
From that and an order denying a new trial, the defendants have appealed.
Their first contention is, that the court erroneously dismissed from the panel a juror, who had been previ*206ously accepted as competent by all parties to the controversy, after the jury was complete, and the trial ready to proceed.
It appears from the record that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith v. Maine Boys Tunnel Co.California Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by6 opinions
- Williams v. BridgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- West Coast Securities Co. v. KilbournCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Quill v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- McKernan v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.