Legal Opinion · Concurrence

McMillen v. Willard Garage, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1968No. 709Published

1ConcurrenceBrown, J.

The following are additional reasons for affirming the final order of the trial court in overruling the defendant’s motion filed within term to vacate the judgment by confession.

In hearing and determining a motion within term, or a petition after term, to vacate or modify a judgment rendered on a promissory note containing a confession-of-judgment clause, the trial court is confronted with a two-pronged inquiry, where the motion or petition for vacation alleges as grounds for vacation facts which call for the application of Subdivision (I) of Section 2325.01, Revised Code, which provides:

“The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Canal Winchester Bank v. ExlineOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Thompson v. LowmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Central National Bank v. Standard Loan & Finance Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Daugherty v. Wilson & SonOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Davis v. TeachnorOhio Court of Appeals · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API