Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re J.S.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 2013No. 2012-0118Published

1DissentLanzinger, J.

{¶ 2} I respectfully dissent from the decision to dismiss this case as having been improvidently accepted. This case, involving as it does a serious-youthful-offender (“SYO”) sentence under R.C. 2152.13, is one of public or great general interest.

{¶ 3} We accepted the state’s proposition of law:

A sentencing error that is not timely appealed, and is unrelated to a juvenile court’s decision to invoke an adult prison sentence against a serious youthful offender, cannot be used to nullify the adult portion of the juvenile’s blended sentence.

In re J.S., 131 Ohio St.3d 1509, 2012-Ohio-1710, 965…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. BezakOhio Supreme Court · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API