In re J.S.
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentLanzinger, J.
{¶ 2} I respectfully dissent from the decision to dismiss this case as having been improvidently accepted. This case, involving as it does a serious-youthful-offender (“SYO”) sentence under R.C. 2152.13, is one of public or great general interest.
{¶ 3} We accepted the state’s proposition of law:
A sentencing error that is not timely appealed, and is unrelated to a juvenile court’s decision to invoke an adult prison sentence against a serious youthful offender, cannot be used to nullify the adult portion of the juvenile’s blended sentence.
In re J.S., 131 Ohio St.3d 1509, 2012-Ohio-1710, 965…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BezakOhio Supreme Court · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.