Legal Opinion
SIPUS
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1972No. 2172PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #2172 MATTER OF SIPUS In Deportation Proceedings A-14293683 Decided by Board November 10, 1972 (1) A mere showing that an alien has achieved the minimum statutory period of continuous physical presence for suspension of deportation does not, without more, justify granting a motion to reopen the deportation proceedings to permit an application for suspension. (2) A motion to reopen the proceedings should disclose all prior and pending judicial litigation in the case. CHARGE: Order: Act of 1952—Section 241(a)(2) [8 U.S.C. 1251(a)(2)]—Nonimmigrant visitor—remained longer than…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Behzad Kasravi v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- WONGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1967
- Kwang Shick Myung v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- WONGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1969
3Cited by36 opinions
- Maricela M. Fernandez, Danelia Fernandez Covarrubias v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha WangSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Tengiz Sevoian v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Samer Mansour v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- S-VBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2000
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.