Legal Opinion
Samer Mansour v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 16, 2000No. 99-3940PublishedCited by 184 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Chief Judge.
The Immigration Court denied Samer Mansour’s claim for asylum as well as withholding of removal, but granted him voluntary departure. Mansour then appealed the Immigration Court’s decision and filed a motion to remand or reopen the proceedings. The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirmed the Immigration Court’s decision concerning Mansour’s asy lum and withholding of removal request and dismissed his appeal. The BIA also denied Mansour’s motion to remand. For the reasons stated below, we affirm in part and remand in part.
Background
Mansour is an unmarried 42-year-old…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Virginia Ragon Achacoso-Sanchez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Ramon Becerra-Jimenez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Ilyas Ahmad v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by184 opinions
- Nadarjh Ramsameachire v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Shrestha v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Navaratwam Kamalthas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Saidou Dia v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Tengiz Sevoian v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.