Wickersham v. Crittenden
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
This is an action brought by a stockholder of a bank for himself and other stockholders, to compel the defendant, Crittenden, to account, as president of said bank, for certain moneys received by him *328for salary as such president, over and above the sum of two hundred dollars per month. Judgment went for plaintiff, and said defendant and the bank, which was made a defendant, appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The general nature of the action appears in the opinion of the court in Wickersham v. Crittenden, 93 Cal. 17 (although matters other…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by6 opinions
- McConnell v. Combination Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- Angelus Securities Corp. v. BallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Kanneberg v. Evangelical Creed CongregationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Schaffhauser v. Arnholt & Schaefer Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.