Legal Opinion

Marple v. Ives

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 23, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Court. — Hon. T. F. Stevenson, Judge. Action to recover commission for negotiating tbe sale of property for defendant. At the close of plaintiffs ease, on motion of defendant tbe court instructed tbe jury to find a verdict in tbe latter’s favor, which was done. From a judgment rendered thereon, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Waterman, J.-

1 Exceptions are taken to certain rulings of tbe court sustaining objections to questions asked by plaintiff of tbe witness King; but the witness answered in each instance, and bis answers were allowed to stand, so no prejudice could have resulted.

2 Plaintiff was employed by defendant to find a purchaser for a stock of goods. He found one King, who seemed likely to buy, if real estate be bad were accepted in payment. To bring tbe matter to a conclusion, defendant made tbe ■ following written proposition (tbe real estate referred to being that owned by King) : “Will accept tbe 320…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. BaxterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  2. Ford v. R. Holt Easley & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  3. Hanna v. CollinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  4. Boland v. KistleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kuiken v. GarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  2. Crane v. Cedar Rapids and Iowa City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  3. Ducummon v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  4. Thompson v. RyanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  5. Kuiken v. GarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API