Legal Opinion
De Young v. Kansas
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided May 9, 1995No. 94-4199-SACPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*951MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, District Judge.
The ease comes before the court on the defendant State of Kansas’ motion to dismiss (Dk. 15) on the basis of Eleventh Amendment immunity, and on the defendant Judge John W. White’s motion to dismiss (Dk. 28) on the basis of judicial immunity and lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The plaintiff, Garry De Young, appearing pro se, has filed several responses to these motions. The court considers both motions ripe for ruling.
STANDARDS FOR MOTION TO DISMISS
A court may dismiss a complaint for “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- De Young v. State of Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Jackson v. MasonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
- Kyle Johnson v. Stephanie Goodenow, et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026