Legal Opinion

Terry Penney v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 1, 2017No. 16-5089PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLE, Chief Judge.

Terry Penney appeals the district court’s denial of his motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) for relief from the district court’s denial of his motion to amend his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence. Penney argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to amend as untimely without first considering the merits of his actual-innocence claim. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

In 2005, a jury convicted Penney of fifteen drug and firearm offenses and an attempt to kill a federal agent. The convictions arose from a police operation to arrest…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Joe Clark Mitchell v. Kevin GenoveseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. Abdul Malik v. GEICO INSURANCE and AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
  3. Aden v. State of TennesseeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
  4. BORETSKY v. RICCIDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
  5. Braxton v. State of TennesseeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API